[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unsecure assoc calls

From: Carl Sorensen
Subject: Re: Unsecure assoc calls
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:41:06 -0600

Hi Michael,

Thanks for your work on this.  I think this is excellent architectural
support for the future.

On 9/20/09 2:11 PM, "Michael Käppler" <address@hidden> wrote:

> I think what now should be done is to check all assoc-get calls whether
> they should use strict_checking or not.
> In some cases this can be quite difficult IMHO and it's a far more
> time-consuming task than what I've done. Maybe Mark can do this? I think
> he digged pretty deep into the scheme code recently.

I don't think that it's worth spending time on this.  I believe that
virtually all of the assoc-get calls as currently written are written to
allow defaults without throwing a programming error, and do not need

As future developments come, or as people are working on code to improve it,
if they want to add strict_checking, that would be fine.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]