[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: output-distance.py
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: output-distance.py |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:12:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:40:35AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > PS that said, if anybody's interested in hacking away at the
> > python scripts, please do!
>
> Would it work if we just calculated the md5 hash for everything
> *except* the preamble? Of course, this would still break automatic
> regtest comparisons with any past versions, but it might be more
> "future proof".
Yes, precisely. Add a "remove preamble" bit to
def relevant_contents (self, ly):
on line 1253.
Cheers,
- Graham
- output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/30
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/30
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/28