[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the guide for contributors, or the guide for a contributor?
|
From: |
Neil Puttock |
|
Subject: |
Re: the guide for contributors, or the guide for a contributor? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:01:11 +0000 |
2009/12/8 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> I was amused by the recent "punctuation fix" commit: I've always
> considered the CG to be "the guide for contributors", or "the
> contributors's [sic] guide". In modern English, the latter is
> abbreviated (condensed?) into "the contributors' guide".
Easily amused, I see. :)
Though I agree with your comments, I elected for "contributor's"
simply because it required fewer changes.
Cheers,
Neil