[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch: issue #659
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Patch: issue #659 |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:42:22 +0000 |
2010/1/6 Marc Hohl <address@hidden>:
> I've just posted a patch for the alternate segno sign.
> To use the new symbol stored at scripts.varsegno, I have
> adapted the arguments for the \bar command.
Very nice. It's a bit different from the examples posted on the
tracker, but looks very elegant. :)
Two general thoughts:
1) I think the internal double bar is a bit too heavy for the glyph,
though I can understand why you'd use the default to tie in with the
span-bar.
2) Should the sign scale for different line-counts? Of course, this
would be much more complicated to implement, since you'd have to split
the glyph into several parts. :)
> There is one problem I didn't manage to solve:
> I had to shrink the width of the character to 0 to place it
> between the double bar lines; this works but has the drawback
> that notes are too close to the segno bar. How can I solve this?
I think if you just add the segno glyph to the double-bar, i.e.,
m.add_at_edge (X_AXIS, LEFT, thin, thinkern);
m.add_at_edge (X_AXIS, RIGHT, thin, thinkern);
m.add_stencil (segno);
you can probably add a correction to the SpanBar to ensure it lines up
with the centre of the segno (either in ly:span-bar::print or as an
'X-offset callback).
Regards,
Neil
- Patch: issue #659, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/06
- Re: Patch: issue #659,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/08
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/08
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Neil Puttock, 2010/01/10
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/11
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/18
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/18
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/19
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/19
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Marc Hohl, 2010/01/19
- Re: Patch: issue #659, Alexander Kobel, 2010/01/19