[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 07:23:36 -0600 |
On 4/17/10 7:08 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>>> My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the
>>> right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc
>>> fix added a few days ago) wasn't included.
>>
>> I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits
>> in lilypond/translation.
>
> I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be
> in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history? I
> mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made
> multiple different versions of the repository; would something
> like that be required in the future?
It looks to me like we have lots of duplicated commits on master.
But I'm not a git expert.
Carl
- 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Graham Percival, 2010/04/16
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/16
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/18