[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rietveld review
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Rietveld review |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 14:39:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> I like the thought of just switching to another developer's branch to
> review, instead of creating my own branch, applying the patch, and
> then testing.
Well, unless the patch fails, there is not much of a difference. For
divergent development, however, it might help that one is talking about
the same thing.
> But I also really like the side-by-side review with inlined comments
> that Rietveld offers.
gerrit?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, (continued)
- Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Rietveld review (was: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures), Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/06
- Re: Rietveld review, Christian Hitz, 2010/05/06
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, Boris Shingarov, 2010/05/03