[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rietveld review

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Rietveld review
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 14:42:50 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:

> On 5/4/10 12:46 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>>> This is a serious question I'd like to ask you.  If you were the king
>>> of LilyPond, what would you establish as the workflow?  I'd really
>>> like to hear your opinion.
>> I'd not prohibit any work flow that can be maintained with single-line
>> git commands.  That includes posting patch series (using
>> git-format-patch and git-mail) and private and public branches.  There
>> are graphical tools for dealing with git branches and commits, there is
>> Emacs.  The established development environment for Lilypond already is
>> a GNU/Linux machine (even if it is a virtual one), so the usual caveats
>> about git workflows on Windows machines don't apply.
> For me, a requirement to use Emacs is a much bigger hurdle than the
> requirement to sign up for a gmail account.

I was not talking about a requirement, but an option.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]