[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:44:27 +0100

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Francisco Vila <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2010/5/21 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>> There's an automatic tool to fill in menus if there's a
>> @menu
>> @end menu
>> see the CG for details.  "scripts to aid doc work" or something like that.
> I've tried it and doesn't work, menu is not filled with
> @unnumberedsubsubsec names. Probably only @nodes are taken as menu
> entries, as existing menus contain section names which have a @node

err... yes.  My previous email was unclear: yes, we need a @node name.
 In fact, our doc policy specifies that we must use @node names
everywhere, for precisely this reason.  However, in some cases this
*will* change the html splitting in a way that isn't appropriate.
That's why I haven't told anybody to go around blindly adding @node

If somebody wants to work on making unfinished doc sections match our
doc policy (such as NR 2.1 Vocals, or anything in NR 3 or higher),
let's talk.

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]