[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Broken beams' slopes

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Broken beams' slopes
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:44:39 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:

> On 8/27/11 7:21 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>>> I wonder if this solution would yield good results: keep beam slope
>>> before and after break identical (except for some beam quanting,
>>> perhaps, but that's less than 0.3 ss), but modify stem lengths: make
>>> them as long as they would be if there were no beam on the other side
>>> of the break.
>> I would expect this to yield mostly reasonably results.  I'd also keep
>> beam orientation.  But it might make sense to dole out a bit of spring
>> force (just decidedly less than infinite) for making the vertical beam
>> positions at the break match.
> It would seem that this algorithm would fail for  a simple broken beam
> a8[ b \break c f]

Care to elaborate?

> Or am I missing something?

No idea.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]