[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: GUB
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:40:54 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: GUB

On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:38:33PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
building package: tools::guile
*** Stage: download (guile, tools)
*** Stage: untar (guile, tools)
*** Stage: patch (guile, tools)
*** Stage: autoupdate (guile, tools)
*** Stage: configure (guile, tools)
*** Stage: compile (guile, tools)
Command barfed: cd /media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/build/guile-1.8.7/libguile

ok, good news: I get the same error.  I'll work it out and get
back to you, maybe in a few hours but possibly in a few days.

- Graham

Bit of a follow-up. As I think I said earlier, the "wrong" version number is in aclocal.m4. This is made with the following:

Must remake target `/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/src/guile-1.8.7/aclocal.m4'. make[1]: Entering directory `/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/build/guile-1.8.7' CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd /media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/src/guile-1.8.7 && /bin/bash /media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/src/guile-1.8.7/build-aux/missing --run aclocal-1.11 -I m4 Putting child 0x01e08b10 (/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/src/guile-1.8.7/aclocal.m4) PID 1865 on the chain. Live child 0x01e08b10 (/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/src/guile-1.8.7/aclocal.m4) PID 1865
Reaping winning child 0x01e08b10 PID 1865
Removing child 0x01e08b10 PID 1865 from chain.
Successfully remade target file `/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/git-gub/gub/target/tools/src/guile-1.8.7/aclocal.m4'.

*/missing appears to simply run aclocal-1.11 (which is an installed program - we deliver 1.10) and this seems to create the aclocal.m4. Can't understand the build system past that, though.

Phil Holmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]