[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issues to verify
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: issues to verify |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:29:00 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri 28 Oct 2011, 07:23 Graham Percival wrote:
> Dmytro,
Hi there,
> I see 40 issues to verify. Some of them are for 2.15.15, which is
> ok since it's only been 3 days since that went up, but I also see
> a bunch for 2.15.14 and 2.15.13.
>
> It's your job to either:
> 1. make the bug squad do their job,
> 2. do their job for them, or
> 3. ask for more help
Please help! -- do anyone need to have 'fixed_X_XX_XX' labels? As I said, they
can make things easier -- yes, it's my own problem, probably -- now I'd like
to ask should we require such labels or not. Do anyone need to have them?
ps. Yes, I am rather "inactive" last two weeks. I am sorry. Probably I should
decide where to move next months.
> We can get into real problems when programmers assume that they've
> fixed something when they haven't.
>
> - Graham
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk "Easy to use" is easy to say.
Bug Squad -- Jeff Garbers