Re: LoMuS

[address@hidden]

On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
>>   I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so that LilyPond can apply
>>   to other software competitions in the future.
> 
> *sigh*
> I'll rehash an old email.
> 

I've gotten two different (I think) responses from Werner and Graham.

I'll formulate my question differently.  If anyone on the development team 
sends me an e-mail saying "Do not submit LilyPond to LoMuS", I won't submit 
LilyPond to LoMuS.  We're all the authors of the program, so if there is a 
person that does not want their work submitted to this competition, that is 
completely legitimate and I won't send it off.

IMHO, it'd be a shame to not enter this contest - it is one of the most 
important music open source competitions in the world (probably the most 
important) and we have a strong chance of doing well in it.

Cheers,
MS