[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:54:00 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Hulin" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)

Hi Arnold,
On 18/07/12 09:16, ArnoldTheresius wrote:

David Kastrup wrote:

... Disagree.  That sort of symbol should count as silent when
reading IMO, even if you might spell it out in phone dictation.

_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel
mailing list address@hidden

Just some quotes from notation.pdf ("old" version 2.15.37): "An
\autoBeamOff call in the first arbument of partcombine ..." "...
brace of the next in an \alternative block, otherwise ..." "...
occurring in an \adQuote command ..." "... custos with an \override
if desired, ..." "When an \augmentum dot appears ..." "... by
naming them on an \include statement." "... will insert an
\allowPageTurn at the final bar line ..."

Common practice seems to vote for 'silent' backslash, just as David

Oh joy, another slice of inconsistency, I've got used to reading the
commands the other way mentally as the docs go to great lengths to
index then all under '\'.
Nice catch for arbument, David,

Not exactly:

Phil Holmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]