[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:18:00 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

>> This is kind of the nub of the issue.  I agree that the notation for
>> staff pitches (and octaves) is going to remain stable -- but I'm
>> _not_ convinced that you can guarantee stability for accidentals or
>> durations.
> At least for German, the current syntax is the only good one IMHO,
> both for accidentals (for the twelve tones of an octave

You mean the 35 tones.  After all, we are talking printed output and not

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]