[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2012 08:15:27 +0200 (CEST) |
>> At least for German, the current syntax is the only good one IMHO,
>> both for accidentals (for the twelve tones of an octave
>
> You mean the 35 tones. After all, we are talking printed output and
> not Midi.
Yes: cis, ces, fisis, feses, etc.
Werner
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, (continued)
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/26
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, David Kastrup, 2012/07/26
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/26
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Graham Percival, 2012/07/26
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/27
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Graham Percival, 2012/07/27
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/27
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/07/28
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, David Kastrup, 2012/07/28
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, David Kastrup, 2012/07/28
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/07/28
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/07/27