[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands |
|
Date: |
Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:12:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:17:53PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> With things like
>>
>> c-\parenthesize-\p
>>
>> no hard and fast syntax rule will resolve the ambiguity caused by your
>> "let's stick - before things applying to the previous element" proposal.
>
> The hard and fast rule is "- attaches to a note; = attaches to the
> prevous element". I don't think that we had a chance to get into
> that during the big meeting.
"the previous element" is the same kind of thing.
c-.=\parenthesize=\tweak #'color #red
Now is the parenthesized . red, or is the paren red?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, (continued)
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Graham Percival, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/06
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/06
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/06
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/06