[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:24:27 +0200 |
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Marc Hohl <address@hidden> wrote:
> It would be interesting to post such issues on the -user list,
> because this would give users a possiblility to contribute *and*
> to describe the new feature from a user's point of view which
> is not a bad thing, after all.
+1. It would also be a good check whether the issue has good enough
description - without good description a user wouldn't know what it's
supposed to do.
cheers,
Janek
- Re: allowing \f and \F, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Message not available
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Thomas Morley, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/21
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/21
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/22
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Graham Percival, 2012/09/23
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/23
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Sue Daniels, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, James, 2012/09/23
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, James, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/22