[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:46:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:11 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [...]
>> In general, not requiring lookahead makes things more versatile.
>> [...]
>
> thanks - i think i more or less understand why we prefer not to
> require lookahead.
> However, i'm not sure whether you are asking us for any opinion (if
> so, what is the question, and can we see "before/after" example?) or
> just letting us know about lookahead - ?
> Sorry for being so direct, but i'm very short on time recently :(
I am considering removing existing functionality that's not likely to
have seen any use so far, but at least is nailed down in regtests
(input/regression/optional-args-backup.ly). So I am looking for
objections.
--
David Kastrup
- [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/07
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/07
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Keith OHara, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/08