lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list


From: Keith OHara
Subject: Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:30:23 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:

> \tweak Accidental.color #red cis

> \override Voice.Accidental color [=] #red

> This is a bit unsatisfactory[sic].  Basically, the optional component is
> separated by a period.  

This is just lovely.  Any optional components are consistently separated 
by periods.

> While that is reasonably understandable, the
> difference in syntax is a bit of a nuisance. 

\tweak and \override have always had different syntax
  \tweak property value item
  \override Grob property = value

> Also, \override syntax is
> backwards compatible, the grob-augmented \tweak syntax (granted, just
> available since 2.16) is not.

Maybe not backwards compatible, but convert-ly-able as shown nicely in 
your patch.

Can anyone reading here (other than David who implemented it) give an 
example where he has used the grob-augmented \tweak syntax ?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]