[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:30:23 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
> \tweak Accidental.color #red cis
> \override Voice.Accidental color [=] #red
> This is a bit unsatisfactory[sic]. Basically, the optional component is
> separated by a period.
This is just lovely. Any optional components are consistently separated
by periods.
> While that is reasonably understandable, the
> difference in syntax is a bit of a nuisance.
\tweak and \override have always had different syntax
\tweak property value item
\override Grob property = value
> Also, \override syntax is
> backwards compatible, the grob-augmented \tweak syntax (granted, just
> available since 2.16) is not.
Maybe not backwards compatible, but convert-ly-able as shown nicely in
your patch.
Can anyone reading here (other than David who implemented it) give an
example where he has used the grob-augmented \tweak syntax ?
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, (continued)
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Keith OHara, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/19
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/13
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/12