[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative pixel-based regtest checker
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative pixel-based regtest checker |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:21:16 +0100 |
On 1 mars 2013, at 22:33, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> There's lots of improvements that could be made: parallelism, using
>> something other than diff, but it basically works.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> CMP(1) User Commands CMP(1)
>
> NAME
> cmp - compare two files byte by byte
>
> SYNOPSIS
> cmp [OPTION]... FILE1 [FILE2 [SKIP1 [SKIP2]]]
>
> DESCRIPTION
> Compare two files byte by byte.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
As LilyPond is non deterministic, it does not draw stencils to the page in the
same order every time, which means (I think) that the same input can generate
two different PNG files. So, a bytewise comparison may trigger false positives.
Cheers,
MS
Re: Alternative pixel-based regtest checker, Phil Holmes, 2013/03/03
Re: Alternative pixel-based regtest checker, Julien Rioux, 2013/03/09