[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:38:43 -0500 |
Hey team,
This message bounced because of the size of the attachment, but I wanted you to
see it anyway (without attachment).
Thanks,
KIeren.
On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Jan-Peter (et al.),
>
> Your edition engraver is amazing, IMO.
>
> Here is page 1 of the Vocal Book for my musical “Fairy Tale Ending”:
>
> <FTE_vocalbook_pg1.pdf>
>
> There are ten tweaks on this page. (Yes, there ultimately need to be a few
> more… but it’s a testament to how awesome Lilypond is that it looks like this
> with only ten small manual adjustments!)
>
> Leveraging the edition engraver, I have removed those tweaks from the content
> — where they were embedded using a frustratingly complex system of tags — and
> put them in the presentation file where they belong; the presentation files
> for the other five standard outputs (i.e., Full Score, Piano/Conductor Score,
> Piano Part, Percussion Part, and Bass Part) will, of course, have their own
> set of tweaks.
>
> Finally, a way to truly separate content from presentation.
> Thank you, Jan-Peter — you have provided me with the biggest improvement in
> my Lilypond workchain since perhaps my very first download of Lilypond. =)
>
> Cheers,
> Kieren.