[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Roman string numbers (issue 145490043 by address@hidden)
|
From: |
pkx166h |
|
Subject: |
Re: Roman string numbers (issue 145490043 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:32:22 +0000 |
:) Sorry. Some more tightening of the text.
https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode127
Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:127: than above.
On 2014/09/29 06:30:27, J_lowe wrote:
This has some awkward syntax. I suggest:
The default number style, as is customary with unfretted strings, can
be printed
in Roman numerals and can also be placed below the staff rather than
above.
'The default number style, as is customary with unfretted strings, can
be printed in Roman numerals and placed below the staff rather than
above.'
https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/