[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compound time signature style
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Compound time signature style |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:20:18 -0500 |
> Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected
>>> the time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable?
>>> For example,
>>>
>>> 2 + 3 2 + 3 4
>>> ----- + C vs. ----- + -
>>> 4 4 4
>>
>> Undesirable in my book.
It seems everyone agrees for once. :)
One more case: \compoundMeter #’(n d). The current implementation prints this
as a fraction (n/d), but I plan to change it to honor the style unless somebody
objects.
—
Dan
- Compound time signature style, Dan Eble, 2014/11/03
- Re: Compound time signature style, Marc Hohl, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Marc Hohl, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Marc Hohl, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/07
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/07
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/07
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/07