Re: Master fails to compile

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

>>> 4.4.3.  It's the version that came with lilydev 1.1
>>
>> I'm surprised it did not blow up around your ears earlier.  That sounds
>> about as old as we had in GUB before we were forced to upgrade in
>> consequence of some template usage patterns last fall.  What's the
>> current version of Lilydev?
>
> Looks like it's 3.0: IIRC James created it and so would be best placed
> to say what the gcc version is.  I'm quite happy to upgrade my gcc
> providing it's not impossible to work out how to do it.  Don't really
> want to trash my current development environment to upgrade to a later
> lilydev.

Well, it would be good if you managed to move GCC up: I don't think it
makes sense trying to accommodate GCC 4.4.3 any more as it is totally a
stab in the dark for most developers to guess what may or may not
compile on that version for what reason.

-- 
David Kastrup