[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (i
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:48:12 +0000 |
On 2015/08/17 14:53:22, dan_faithful.be wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 10:32 , mailto:address@hidden wrote:
>
> The problem I have is that it's hard to remember the order of
arguments.
> So I decided to use assignment-like order. A reasonably good name
> would have been just \accepts but that is already taken.
\accepts could be renamed if it would help, right? (I’m at work and
can’t spend
time brainstorming, but I couldn’t resist mentioning it.)
Not worth throwing everything overboard.
Maybe \accept-equally "MyStaff" "Staff" ? Still cumbersome but less
awkward, and "equally" is more compatible with the new-old order than
"like".
https://codereview.appspot.com/260800043/
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), paulwmorris, 2015/08/17
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/08/17
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/08/17
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden),
dak <=
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), paulwmorris, 2015/08/18
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/08/18
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), paulwmorris, 2015/08/18