[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: midi articulation
From: |
Daniel Birns |
Subject: |
Re: midi articulation |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:31:53 -0700 |
PDF viewers is a different class of problem.
I’ll be concrete.
1) I’m on a mac, and have 3 midi players available to me: Quicktime (free),
Garage Band(free), Sibelius. Of course, Sibelius is a bad example, because it’s
a direct competitor with lilypond, but I have it.
2) I’m using this string quartet example:
http://le-concert.pagesperso-orange.fr/giordani/op-8/10006-giordani-op8-1-lys.zip
<http://le-concert.pagesperso-orange.fr/giordani/op-8/10006-giordani-op8-1-lys.zip>
3) I do lilypond 10006-Giordani-Op8-1-Midi-1.ly producing
10006-Giordani-Op8-1-Midi-1.midi
4) I play it with Quicktime. The result is awful — sounds like the chipmunks
playing harmonicas.
5) I drag and drop it into Garage band. The result is better, but the
instruments are wrong: it maps all 3 instruments to something called “String
ensemble”. Who knows why. So I remap them to vln, vla, cl to something closer
to a single person playing that instrument. Still sounds poor but much better.
6) I modify the instrument and the effects. This process takes some time.
7) Now, in order to get a better sound, I’m going to have to go back to the
lilypond source, make some edits.
8) In order to hear these changes I must redo all the work in #5 and #6.
9) I give my lilypond file to someone. They have no chance of making edits, and
then recreating what I did in steps 5 and 6.
10 I share my midi file with someone. They have no chance of recreating the
sound I’m getting. I’d have to send them the Garage Band file, and hope they
have a mac, and they don’t downloading this huge app (which I think is free).
There’s nothing like this with PDF or any other aspect of this process. If I
want a decent Midi performance using lilypad, I must either keep redoing steps
6 and 7 with every edit, which probably is not feasible. What’s more likely is
I’ll do step 5 over and over, and then at some point say “this is the final
version” and fine-tune the midi performance.
Perhaps I’m wrong but some of this. I hope so…
-d
> Integrated score editing environments like Frescobaldi could probably
> include a General MIDI soundfont and a MIDI player, but I don’t think
> Lilypond should ensure the availability of MIDI players. It already
> doesn’t care what DVI or PDF viewer is installed (if any).
>
> Lilypond currently doesn’t generate all performance information that the
> MIDI format allows. When MIDI itself becomes the limiting factor (which
> it is not now) it may make sense to also offer OSC support.
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
- Fwd: midi articulation, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/24
- Re: midi articulation, Carl Sorensen, 2016/03/24
- Re: midi articulation, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/24
- Re: midi articulation, Carl Sorensen, 2016/03/24
- Re: midi articulation, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/03/25
- Re: midi articulation,
Daniel Birns <=
- Re: midi articulation, Carl Sorensen, 2016/03/25
- Re: midi articulation, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/25
- Re: midi articulation, Carl Sorensen, 2016/03/25
- Re: midi articulation, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/25
- Re: midi articulation, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/25
- Re: midi articulation, David Kastrup, 2016/03/25
- building from source, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/26
- Re: building from source, Dan Eble, 2016/03/26
- Re: building from source, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/26
- Re: building from source, Daniel Birns, 2016/03/26