[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:16:41 +0100 |
2016-11-21 13:09 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite <address@hidden>:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:59:17 +0100
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> 2016-11-21 10:49 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite <address@hidden>:
>>
>> > Can I look at your ./56/lily-44b4b5eb.eps file?
>>
>> Here you are.
>>
>
> The problem is that there are still some numbers formatted with commas
> as decimal points when producing EPS: it shows in the standalone
> command line too if you use '-dbackend=eps'.
>
> The following change fixes it:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/ly/init.ly b/ly/init.ly
> index 58b2fac..8fdc6e2 100644
> --- a/ly/init.ly
> +++ b/ly/init.ly
> @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
> #(if (guile-v2)
> (begin
> (use-modules (ice-9 curried-definitions))
> - (setlocale LC_ALL "")))
> + (setlocale LC_ALL "")
> + (setlocale LC_NUMERIC "C")))
>
> #(session-initialize
> (lambda ()
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> And this will also replace my previous ugly attempt of messing around
> with LC_NUMERIC in lily/general-scheme.cc.
I reverted locally "Print floating point variables using a period as
the decimal separator" and applied your code above.
I got a successful "make LANGS='' doc"
That's great!
Next would be a full "make doc" or at least with the Japanese docs to
proof non latin.
And I'd like to do a regtest-comparison, between builds with guile
1.8.8 and 2.0.13
Although, I currently don't know if this is possible at all with our
"make test-baseline"/"make check"-procedures.
Will try tomorrow.
If all this only would not last ages on my weak laptop...
Thanks,
Harm
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/20
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/20
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Message not available
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23