[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al. |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:33:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Carl,
>
>> You have not yet tested your baseline-skip parameter with a different
>> default-staff-size. I think that you will probably need to include the
>> default baseline-skip when determining the new baseline-skip. Font sizes
>> avoid this problem by using a scale parameter. I don't know that it's
>> possible to use a scale parameter for baseline-skip.
>
> In my exchange with David K on -user, I asked why there are so many
> different functions for font sizing… Now I see that the existing
> \fontsize automagically adjusts both baseline-skip *and* word-space
> (which I hadn't even considered).
>
> In light of that, doesn't it make sense to just redefine \huge et
> al. to call \fontsize directly? cf. snippet (below, with comment
> strings removed here)
>
> Why would it not have been this way to begin with? Is there some
> side-effect that I can't predict?
Maybe check the effects that super- and subscripts cause on a block of
text? I'd not be able to tell offhand whether that's a concern, nor
whether it possibly being a concern might have changed due to
line-spacing changes in the last stable versions.
--
David Kastrup
- [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Kieren MacMillan, 2017/06/07
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Kieren MacMillan, 2017/06/07
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al.,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Kieren MacMillan, 2017/06/14
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Kieren MacMillan, 2017/06/25
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Marc Hohl, 2017/06/25
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Kieren MacMillan, 2017/06/25
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., James, 2017/06/25
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Kieren MacMillan, 2017/06/25
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., James, 2017/06/26
- Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al., Kieren MacMillan, 2017/06/26