[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 3128: add Haydn-style turns to Feta (issue 340660043 by addres

From: lilypond
Subject: Re: Issue 3128: add Haydn-style turns to Feta (issue 340660043 by address@hidden)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:42:12 -0700

On 2018/04/08 18:05:49, Dan Eble wrote:
Having two symbols available does not necessarily require having
unique commands
for them.  For example, LilyPond supports different styles of
rests, but they're all represented with R.  I'm trying to understand
these scripts are semantically distinct or just stylistically

How would one make a single command that can use both styles? Maybe
something like

\override Script.haydnturn-style = #'turn % default #'wiggle


It sounds like you're saying we don't know if they are semantically
therefore we should implement commands as if they are.  I have no
objection to
that; I just want to understand the intent and encourage an
implementation that
suits it.

We don’t exactly know if \slashturn and \turn are semantically distinct
either … As stated in my last post above it looks like many of these
prall/mordent/turn/XXXturn symbols can replace each other in different

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]