[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rational

From: Hans Åberg
Subject: Re: Rational
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 14:58:12 +0200

> On 23 May 2018, at 14:34, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>> I mentioned that the GC supports traditional allocations/deallocation,
>> but they must be traced so as to not end up with dead pointers.
> Hans, please.  You are proferring utter trivialities.  There is a reason
> that Guilev2 support is available in a rudimentary form, and the reason
> is that people actually have bothered dealing with the respective
> problems and getting Boehm GC bugs flagged and fixed or at least worked
> around in the Guile and LilyPond code bases.
> If you don't believe me, feel free to make yourself acquainted with the
> respective code.  You want to offer advice but at your current level of
> knowledge about LilyPond, it would be a rather strange coincidence if
> you could offer anything not already well-known and well-considered.

They are not mentioned in the link you gave, so it looks as though like you 
insist on using untraceable containers, which of course, will end up with dead 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]