Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden)

[Dan Eble]

On Feb 1, 2020, at 06:39, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> You provided a lot of good information in your post, but the
>> conclusion was not entirely clear.
>> Are you suggesting requiring SSE2 at this time?
> 
> Yes.  It appears to get used anyway for 64bit executables, and it seems
> safe enough to demand it for 32bit executables.

+1
far better than inline asm poking control registers
— 
Dan