[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by addres
|
From: |
jonas . hahnfeld |
|
Subject: |
Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:44:46 -0700 |
Please give reasons for changes, ie why isn't it necessary to do a deep
copy? Is it currently not failing a test, are the shallow copies
immutable anyway, is there some other guarantee? IMO pushing less
changes with strictly better descriptions will get us further in the
long run.
https://codereview.appspot.com/561640045/
- Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden),
jonas . hahnfeld <=
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/13
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/13
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/15