[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by ad
|
From: |
hanwenn |
|
Subject: |
Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:00:11 -0700 |
On 2020/04/13 20:44:47, hahnjo wrote:
> Please give reasons for changes, ie why isn't it necessary to do a
deep copy? Is
> it currently not failing a test, are the shallow copies immutable
anyway, is
> there some other guarantee?
Done.
https://codereview.appspot.com/561640045/
- Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/13
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden),
hanwenn <=
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/13
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/14
- Re: Copy alist instead of deep copy on Grob clone (issue 561640045 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/04/15