Re: [RFC] Use GitLab Milestones

[Dan Eble]

On Jun 23, 2020, at 04:40, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> wrote:
>> 
> Pretty much that: You can only have one label from the same scope, and
> assigning a second automatically removes the old (cf. Patch::*). I
> actually agree that multiple Type's might be useful. If others are in
> favor as well, we can just rename the labels.

My default position is to avoid restrictions when there isn't a good reason for 
them.  There are some types in the current set that I can't imagine using 
together – for example (Enhancement|Maintainability) with 
(Crash|Defect|Regression) – but unless that endangers the efficiency of 
someone's workflow, I don't think we should spend time compartmentalizing them.

Patch::* obviously need to remain scoped because they name states in a state 
machine.
— 
Dan