Re: triangle chord notation

[Rick Hansen (aka RickH)]

Oops I meant to say...

"C9add6 would also have the flatted seventh <c e g a bf d>" in first
sentence of previous post, not <c e g a bf>

Rick



Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote:
> 
> C9add6 would also have the flatted seventh <c e g a bf> making it
> completely different than C69, most readers know that a C9 functions as a
> dominant spring and C69 as a tonic or major.  But C69 omits the seventh <c
> e g a d>.  CM9 would have the natural maj seventh <c e g b d> .  CM13 has
> the natural maj seventh and the 6th (or thirteenth, 9th optional, 11th
> omitted) <c e g b d a'> and <c e g b a'> are both CM13 chords with one
> omitting the ninth.  C13 again is a dominant flatted seventh with 11th
> omitted, 9th optional, and 13th (or sixth) present depending on how your
> instrument is able to finger it.
> 
> Right about markup, we can always do that any time, but it wont transpose
> making it useless for chords.  I prefer using notes anyway <c e g> in the
> ChordNames context, then add exceptions as needed, but thats just me. 
> That way I can code all my inversions correctly and use those note
> variables over again on a staff with the correct inversions showing.  If
> the name that emitted on the ChordNames staff is not what I want I add it
> to the exception list.  But sometimes the exception lookup routine fails
> because it's not a 1 to 1 lookup with your source file.  And that is the
> most frustrating "bug" that needs to be fixed.
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/triangle-chord-notation-tf2042072.html#a5672886
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.