Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question

[Frédéric Chiasson]

Yes, that makes sense.

Frédéric

2006/12/21, John Mandereau <address@hidden>:

Frédéric Chiasson wrote:
> But to avoid repeating \tuplet functions for long passages with the
> same tuplets, we could admit that kind of syntax :
>
> \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e f g a b c d e d c b a g f e d}
>
> without having one long bracket going through all the notes. But I
> understand that you don't want to change that for programming issues.

It is not possible to determine whether "long" tuplets should be
splitted or not; how then would you determine whether

\tuplet 3:2 {c4 c8 c c4}

should be printed as

|----- 3 ----|
      __
|   |  |   |
|   |  |   |
X   X  X   X

or as

|- 3 -| |- 3 -|

|   |\  |\  |
|   |   |   |
X   X   X   X

?

In your example,

\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)

can already save from typing \tuplet (\times today) a lot of times.

Cheers,
--
John Mandereau <address@hidden>