[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR status
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: LSR status |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:13:50 +0200 |
2008/8/30 Damian leGassick <address@hidden>:
> surely if a snippet deserves/needs to be in LSR it should be incorporated
> into the next revision of the docs?
Actually, the docs only include a selection of the most relevant snippets.
The LSR is not only meant for pedagogical purposes, but also to
demonstrate some cool hack you may have found, some workaround, some
support for exotic instruments/notations, etc. Plus, it's some kind of
a "laboratory" that helps improving the docs (after selection and
edition of the chosen snippets).
Cheers,
Valentin
- LSR status, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/08/25
- Re: LSR status, Valentin Villenave, 2008/08/26
- Re: LSR status, Graham Percival, 2008/08/27
- Re: LSR status, Eluze Weehaeli, 2008/08/27
- Re: LSR status, Graham Percival, 2008/08/27
- Re: LSR status, Eluze Weehaeli, 2008/08/27
- Re: LSR status, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/08/27
- Re: LSR status, Damian leGassick, 2008/08/30
- Re: LSR status, Johan Vromans, 2008/08/30
- Re: LSR status, Damian leGassick, 2008/08/30
- Re: LSR status,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: LSR status, Damian leGassick, 2008/08/30