[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius

From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:43:36 +0200 (CEST)

>> Or would you object to such a syntax change?
> Only if it (adversely) affected the flexibility of whitespace
> elsewhere -- for example,
>     g~   versus   g ~
>     g(  versus   g (
>     etc.

I use `g ~' also

> If the parser is smart enough to isolate the duration-whitespace
> from anythingelse-whitespace, then it won't affect my (current)
> code.

AFAIK, there must not be any other expression between a note name (or
chord) and a rhythm specification, so I don't see problems.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]