|
From: | Stjepan Horvat |
Subject: | Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor |
Date: | Sun, 5 Feb 2012 21:25:36 +0100 |
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, James <address@hidden> wrote:Frescobaldi looks nice (although the pdf preview didn't work for me),
> Frescobaldi has a heap more useful features though for serious use than this experimental website - that's not to disparage what is done here, it's a nice piece of work.
>
> The Implication that Mr Kulp made was basically not having to keep opening a PDF separately from the editor.
>
I didn't mean to say anything against it. What I like about the web
app is that one needn't install anything. I personally use vim and a
shell script of my own for previewing. I wouldn't use either
Frescobaldi or the web app for myself, I just meant the web app is
great to give super-quick intro without having to install anything.
Jon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |