[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:04:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi David,
>
> 2012/2/19 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
>> Hi Harm,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2) "correct" the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for that
>>> move. Which you do is up to you - bear in mind that if you go for 2), then
>>> it's possible that the work will be wasted if we struggle to get the LSR
>>> updated. However, you will at least be prepared.
>>>
>>
>> If you'd like to go the route of updating syntax in the problem files to
>> 2.14, then I'll be happy to take on part of the task. Just let me know!
>>
>> -David
>
> I fixed already following files:
>
> Altering-the-number-of-stems-in-a-beam.ly
> I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
>
> automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly
> I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
>
> coloring-individual-staff-lines.ly
> I added the definition for interval-translate from 2.12.3
> Better use an other fix?
[...]
Did you try using convert-ly? If it works, the fix is likely somewhat
related to the "right" behavior according to whoever wrote the
convertrules.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Carl Sorensen, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19