[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tunefl and other web services
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: tunefl and other web services |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jul 2012 00:04:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:29:28AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Do we know about http://tunefl.com ?
>
> Also, should we be mentioning commercial services like scorio.com
> on our website?
Commercial services are ok, but non-Free software is not. The GNU
coding standards are quite clear on this:
"A GNU program should not recommend, promote, or grant legitimacy
to the use of any non-free program. Proprietary software is a
social and ethical problem, and our aim is to put an end to that
problem."
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/References.html
This is a bit of a shame, since it's nice "advertising" to show
how lilypond is used, but I didn't make up the rules, and it's
entirely consistent with GNU's position.
- Graham
Re: tunefl and other web services, Tim Roberts, 2012/07/05
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/05
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Valentin Villenave, 2012/07/05
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/05
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/06
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/06