[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new sta
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:36:17 +0200 |
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> LilyPond is supposed to
> be useful without having to extend it.
>
>> In other words, an a-priori refusal of Scheme isn't helpful if you
>> want to explore the capabilities of LilyPond.
>
> If you want to _extend_ them. LilyPond is nowhere near the state where
> every imaginable music typesetting task is available as a turnkey
> solution. But that does not mean having to use Scheme is an ideal or a
> goal for LilyPond.
>
> Many houseowners get along without doing masonry themselves.
+1
> Our Scheme introductions are not really much more than a cursory
> introduction. Explaining the concepts of Scheme exhaustively would be
> beyond the LilyPond manuals.
>
> Its purpose is mostly getting people's feet wet enough that they don't
> see the point in putting their socks back on.
>
> It would seem that we need to do a bit more splashing before this works
> reliably.
:)
cheers,
Janek
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, (continued)
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/26
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, james, 2012/10/26
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Kastrup, 2012/10/26
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, james, 2012/10/26
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/26
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, james, 2012/10/27
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Kastrup, 2012/10/27
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/27
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/27
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Kastrup, 2012/10/27
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version,
Janek Warchoł <=
- A documentation suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, james, 2012/10/27
- Re: A documentation suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Kastrup, 2012/10/27
- Re: A documentation suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/28
- Re: A documentation suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Kastrup, 2012/10/28
- Re: A documentation suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/28
- Re: A documentation suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Marek Klein, 2012/10/31
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, Joram Berger, 2012/10/27
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Nalesnik, 2012/10/27
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Nalesnik, 2012/10/26
- Re: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading to the new stable version, David Kastrup, 2012/10/26