[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:46:59 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Adam Spiers <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:51 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Adam Spiers <address@hidden> writes:
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Adam Spiers <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> I just blogged about this:
>>>> Well, I see some fatally flawed assumptions here, riding on your
>>>> notion "both MuseScore and GNU LilyPond would serve as excellent
>>>> starting points for a world-class music notation product."
>>>> Now I can't vouch for MuseScore, but GNU LilyPond is anything but a
>>>> "starting point" for software development.  It is large with an
>>>> elaborate and complex architecture.  And most particularly, an
>>>> architecture that is not the core expertise of the former Sibelius
>>>> development team.
>>> I don't follow your logic here at all.

And it is clear that you won't, so we might as well call it a day.
Anybody actually interested in the argument has had ample opportunity to
make himself acquainted with our reasonings.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]