[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chord symbol styling
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: chord symbol styling |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:13:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> writes:
> On 27.10.2015 13:00, David Kastrup wrote:
>> 6 whole steps per octave. So if I want to illustrate the shrinking of
>> distances higher up the fretboard, I can just add -0.5 per semitone to
>> the font-size. Or something.
>
> :-)
Well, arguably it makes a bit more sense than Knuth's choice of a
magstep being a factor of 1.2. Because the powers of 2^{1:12} as the
basis of half a magstep are known to be close enough for practical
purposes to a variety of small-integer-based ratios.
3:2? Try font-size 3.5. 4:3? Try font-size 2.5. 5:4? How about
font-size 2?
Eat your heart out, Don: there's music in _our_ choice.
--
David Kastrup
- chord symbol styling, Bric, 2015/10/26
- Re: chord symbol styling, tisimst, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Bric, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Noeck, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Simon Albrecht, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, David Kastrup, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Simon Albrecht, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: chord symbol styling, mskala, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/10/27