[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chord symbol styling
From: |
mskala |
Subject: |
Re: chord symbol styling |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:12:31 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LNX 67 2015-01-07) |
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, David Kastrup wrote:
> Well, arguably it makes a bit more sense than Knuth's choice of a
> magstep being a factor of 1.2. Because the powers of 2^{1:12} as the
> basis of half a magstep are known to be close enough for practical
> purposes to a variety of small-integer-based ratios.
So, will a future version allow microtypographical 2^{1/19} magnification
steps? :-)
--
Matthew Skala
address@hidden People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
- chord symbol styling, Bric, 2015/10/26
- Re: chord symbol styling, tisimst, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Bric, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Noeck, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Simon Albrecht, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, David Kastrup, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, Simon Albrecht, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling, David Kastrup, 2015/10/27
- Re: chord symbol styling,
mskala <=
- Re: chord symbol styling, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/10/27