[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strings as variable names
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: Strings as variable names |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Dec 2015 19:57:22 +0100 |
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:03 +0000
David Sumbler <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > It's not really making stuff more readable.
>
> I think it would be useful to have it added to the NR.
If it's part of the language syntax, it should be documented.
If it's experimental, dangerous, or deprecated, it should be documented as
such.
If it is unwanted, it should be removed from the language syntax.
There's no point in having undocumented language features, because these
will only lead to errors and confusion.
-- Johan
http://johan.vromans.org/seasons_greetings.html
- Re: Strings as variable names, (continued)
- Re: Strings as variable names, Marc Hohl, 2015/12/28
- Re: Strings as variable names, Thomas Morley, 2015/12/28
- Re: Strings as variable names, Johan Vromans, 2015/12/28
- Re: Strings as variable names, Simon Albrecht, 2015/12/28
- Re: Strings as variable names, David Kastrup, 2015/12/28
- Re: Strings as variable names, Simon Albrecht, 2015/12/29
- Re: Strings as variable names, David Kastrup, 2015/12/29
- Re: Strings as variable names, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/28
Re: Strings as variable names,
Johan Vromans <=