[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly? |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:40:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri 08 Apr 2016 at 09:40:30 (+0100), Richard Shann wrote:
[...]
> style, but something like that with no church rests, numerical time
What are these? Misericords?
Cheers,
David.
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, (continued)
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Karen S. Billings, 2016/04/05
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, David Wright, 2016/04/06
- RE: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/04/06
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Karen S. Billings, 2016/04/06
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/07
- RE: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/04/07
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Karen S. Billings, 2016/04/07
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Richard Shann, 2016/04/08
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?,
David Wright <=
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Richard Shann, 2016/04/08
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, David Wright, 2016/04/08
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Richard Shann, 2016/04/08
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/08
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/07
- Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/07
Re: AutoBeam Behaving Properly?, Dominic, 2016/04/05