[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

From: Torsten Hämmerle
Subject: Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:34:22 -0700 (MST)

Werner LEMBERG wrote
> In this proofsheet the spacing for smaller sizes is not `natural'.
> For example, the distance between the clef and the accidentals for
> `feta11' is very large.  Is this intentional?  I think it's a bit
> confusing.

Hmmm, I was wondering, too.
I just used \score inside a custom markup-command and set the size by 
\layout { #(layout-set-staff-size design_size) }

It looks as if #(layout-set-staff-size) doesn't scale down all the
The key signatures all start at the same positions, independent of the stave

The funny thing is that the "Notation" document claims 
Known issues and warnings: "layout-set-staff-size does not change the
distance between the staff lines."

As far as I can see it at the moment, the distance between staff lines seems
to be one of the few distances it does change.

Well, that's a brilliant opportunity for checking out the brand-new
\magnifyStaff functionality - e voilà !

*Next attempt:*
Now, the spacing looks much (!) better.

Werner LEMBERG wrote
> And there is a typo: s/astificially/artificially/.

Yes, thank you, I noticed it just about three seconds after pushing the
"post message" button (that's typical of me...)

Thanks for the observation(s)

Sent from:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]