[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: m7.5- transposed to sus#4 b3 ??
From: |
Sandro Santilli |
Subject: |
Re: m7.5- transposed to sus#4 b3 ?? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2019 09:56:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:08:07PM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Am Mo., 11. Nov. 2019 um 21:38 Uhr schrieb Sandro Santilli <address@hidden>:
> >
> > I transcribed an A major song with this chords snippet:
> >
> > ees:m7.5- | aes:7 | aes:m7.5- | des:7 |
> >
> > When transposing it to Eb major it is rendered as:
> >
> > Bbbø | Ebb7 | Ebb7sus#4 b3 | Abb7
> If you transpose the note eeses down an augmented 4th the note beseses
> results.
I did not transpose eeses, but ees.
> If you let the chords display in \new Staff you get a warning:
> 2.18.2:
> warning: Transposing eeses'' by ges makes alteration larger than double
Indeed I do get that warning, but I was not transposing eeses ??
Where does 'eeses' come from ?
> To circumvent, you could do \transpose a dis instead.
Yup, this one fixes the warning and the weird rendering.
Still uses double-alterations (double-sharps) but that's a
separate issue (does lilypond have any support to automatically
simpmlify those notes and/or chords?).
> Though, tbh I doubt chords based on ees, aes, des _in_ a-major are
> correct at all.
> Probably some modulation/key-change before? Or copy from a weird source?
It's "The Shadow Of Your Smile" from the Real Book. I'm not sure
what's going on there, harmonically.
--strk;