[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:55:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; de; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Firefox/3.5.1 |
Follow-up Comment #17, bug #27049 (project lwip):
The question is whether the server *must* start over (according to the RFC)
or if it is allowed to process every packet as it comes in. If it starts over,
reusing XIDs won't change anything. However, if it doesn't (e.g. embedded
device that takes some time for answering), things get easier when reusing
XIDs.
The point is I don't have a clue why cisco routers take so long to answer: I
cannot imagine them being poorly programmed, so it must be some kind of load
balancing.
To summarize, we should both increase the timeouts and think about reusing
XIDs, but as the RFCs don't seem too chatty about this, I think it would be a
good solution to look at other OSes/stacks and see what they do (since most
routers/DHCP servers will be compatible to windows or linux).
Anyway, is this planned for 1.3.1 or later?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?27049>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, (continued)
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/17
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/07/18
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Kieran Mansley, 2009/07/20
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/20
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/07/21
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Kieran Mansley, 2009/07/22
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/07/22
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/22
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/07/22
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Bill Auerbach, 2009/07/22
- [lwip-devel] [bug #27049] DHCP IP address assignment with multiple lwIP devices fails, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/07/22